American Society of Plastic Surgeons
For Medical Professionals
 

Plastic Surgeons Generally Agree on Best Approach to Breast Augmentation


While debate continues on some topics, US plastic surgeons agree on key aspects of technique for breast augmentation surgery—including implant type and size, incision, and location of implant placement, reports a survey study in the April issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery®, the official medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).

"There is a generally agreed-on approach to breast augmentation among survey respondents that encompasses many variables," write ASPS Member Surgeons Dr. David A. Hidalgo of Weil Cornell Medical College and Dr. Sammy Sinno of New York University Medical Center. But they also note that plastic surgeons have been slow to adopt some newer technologies, often because they perceived a lack of evidence on safety or effectiveness.

Plastic Surgeons Asked About Preferred Techniques for Breast Augmentation

The researchers sent an electronic questionnaire to nearly 5,000 active ASPS Member Surgeons to ask about current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Responses from 1,067 surgeons identified general agreement in several key areas, including:

  • Implant type and placement. The surgeons preferred round-shaped implants, rather than anatomically (teardrop)-shaped implants. They also favored silicone implants, with a smooth rather than a textured surface. By far, most surgeons used an incision under the breast (inframammary) and placed the implant "under the muscle" (in partial submuscular pockets).
  • Implant sizing. Most surgeons still relied on "low-tech" methods— silicone implants or forms, or even "rice bags"—to assess the best implant size for individual patients. Few used recently introduced 3D imaging techniques for implant sizing. The most common implant size range was 300 to 350 cc (about 10 to 12 fluid ounces).
  • Fat grafting. Most plastic surgeons did not routinely use fat grafting—transferring fat to the breasts from elsewhere in the patient's body—as either a primary or supplemental technique. While this technique has received increased attention in recent years, some surgeons expressed potential safety concerns, such as interference with breast cancer screening.
  • New technologies. The low use of fat grafting and 3D imaging reflected a sense of caution about adopting newer technologies. A notable exception was a biomaterial called acellular dermal matrix, which gained high acceptance for use in revision surgery or secondary breast augmentation procedures.
  • Complications. The plastic surgeons generally agreed on the management of common complications, such as contractures (scar tissue around the implant) and the need for secondary surgery.

Breast augmentation is the most frequently performed aesthetic plastic surgery procedure in the United States, with nearly 280,000 procedures performed in 2015. In recent years, several new options and techniques for breast augmentation have been introduced. The new study provides a "snapshot" of the techniques used by US plastic surgeons, as well as their views on current trends and controversies.

The results show a general consensus on many aspects of the breast augmentation, including implant selection and placement techniques. The findings also suggest that plastic surgeons tend to be conservative in adopting newer techniques—particularly if they perceive a lack of supporting evidence in terms of safety or effectiveness.

"By revealing the current practices of ASPS members, this study better informs plastic surgeons and patients on the current state-of-the art of breast augmentation," Dr. Hidalgo comments. "Breast augmentation is a still-evolving procedure, and surgeons continuously seek to use the proven techniques that will provide optimal safety and outcomes for their patients."

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® is published by Wolters Kluwer.

Click here to read "Current Trends and Controversies in Breast Augmentation."

Article: "Current Trends and Controversies in Breast Augmentation." (doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000481110.31939.e4)

About Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

For more than 70 years, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. The official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair and cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medico-legal issues.

About ASPS

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) is the largest organization of board-certified plastic surgeons in the world. Representing more than 7,000 physician members, the society is recognized as a leading authority and information source on cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. ASPS comprises more than 94 percent of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the United States. Founded in 1931, the society represents physicians certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery or The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

About Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.

Wolters Kluwer reported 2019 annual revenues of €4.6 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 19,000 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.

Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students in effective decision-making and outcomes across healthcare. We support clinical effectiveness, learning and research, clinical surveillance and compliance, as well as data solutions. For more information about our solutions, visit https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/health and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter @WKHealth.

For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Logo

Patient Care Center